On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 02:32:45PM -0500, pf at alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
> But I don't see the point of adding more generic information in the
> response.
Providing a URL of a website which explains (for the reject messages
that you choose to document) what a sender needs to do to avoid being
reject will do no harm when appended to reject messages that are
already "self-documenting" or which you would choose to no explain
further. The URL can explain that too.
> The only rejects that I get calls or emails about are:
>
> reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname,
> reject_unknown_helo_hostname,
> reject_unknown_client_hostname,
> reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
>
> If these four rejects had individually configurable error text, it would
> help a lot.
There are surely more, and making the text context-specific is likely
not a good cost/benefit trade-off.
--
Viktor.
