Michael Orlitzky put forth on 11/5/2010 1:39 AM: > On 11/05/10 00:11, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> Michael Orlitzky put forth on 11/4/2010 8:06 PM: >>> On 11/04/2010 12:39 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >>>> Ned Slider put forth on 11/3/2010 6:33 PM: >>>> >>>>> My other thought was to simply comment (or document) ranges known to >>>>> contain FPs and then the user can make a judgement call whether they >>>>> want to comment out that particular regex based on their circumstances. >>>>> Not a very elegant solution. >>>> >>>> I'm starting to wonder, considering your thoughts on FPs, if this might >>>> be better implemented, for OPs concerned with potential FPs, via a >>>> policy daemon, or integrated into SA somehow and used for scoring >>>> instead of outright blocking. I don't have the programmatic skill to >>>> implement such a thing. >>> >>> >>> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/RDNS_DYNAMIC >> >> Any idea where I can get a look that the regexes they use in this rule? >> > > I think this is the latest: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/rules/branches/3.2/20_dynrdns.cf
Did you happen to notice the absolutely tiny number of expressions in the SA file, as compared to the ~1600 in the file whose use I promote here? Maybe I should get in contact with someone in the project. If only half were deemed usable by them it would be a huge improvement over what they have. -- Stan
