On 11/05/10 00:11, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Michael Orlitzky put forth on 11/4/2010 8:06 PM: >> On 11/04/2010 12:39 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >>> Ned Slider put forth on 11/3/2010 6:33 PM: >>> >>>> My other thought was to simply comment (or document) ranges known to >>>> contain FPs and then the user can make a judgement call whether they >>>> want to comment out that particular regex based on their circumstances. >>>> Not a very elegant solution. >>> >>> I'm starting to wonder, considering your thoughts on FPs, if this might >>> be better implemented, for OPs concerned with potential FPs, via a >>> policy daemon, or integrated into SA somehow and used for scoring >>> instead of outright blocking. I don't have the programmatic skill to >>> implement such a thing. >> >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/RDNS_DYNAMIC > > Any idea where I can get a look that the regexes they use in this rule? >
I think this is the latest: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/rules/branches/3.2/20_dynrdns.cf
