On 16 juil. 2010, at 09:27, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: > In Germany many companies have given up on content filtering because it is > not allowed to drop mail after accepting, if there is a chance that private > mail *could* be involved. So with content filter your only choice would be to > tag spam and let the user sort out, which lead to no advantage for using > content filter at all. > So content filter are mostly a selling point and not a favorable "solution".
Before-queue content filtering is great. It demands more CPU because the filtering must be very fast, but it works. In France, we have a similar limitation: it's illegal to destroy a communication (mail, email…). With BQCF spam is rejected, not destroyed. Patrick PRONIEWSKI -- Administrateur Système - SENTIER - Université Lumière Lyon 2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
