Re: Better spam filter for postfix

[lst_hoe02]

Zitat von Henrik K <h...@hege.li>:

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:06:44PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:

I will say generically that for an OP who has the time, avoiding content

long run and makes more efficient use of network and server resources.

filters and using SMTP time blocking methods is probably more effective in the

You always have time to advertise content filters being "bad", so I just
have to make a pointless rebuttal..

Can you tell me any big public service (not a one man server) that doesn't
use content filtering at all? By public I don't mean a site that has the
ability to block freemailers, universities, etc hacked accounts..

So content filter are mostly a selling point and not a favorable "solution".

Regards

Andreas

In Germany many companies have given up on content filtering because it is not allowed to drop mail after accepting, if there is a chance that private mail *could* be involved. So with content filter your only choice would be to tag spam and let the user sort out, which lead to no advantage for using content filter at all.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Signatur