On 29.06.24 14:09, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
Oh. I thought I would see them like I see these 10025 entries:
Jun 29 00:00:02 cjbnew postfix/smtp[15813]: <
127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10025: 220 filter.mynetwork.local ESMTP
including the port number. I added your suggestion and I see the
traffic now for spampd but 10026 is not mentioned in those log
entries.
Just saying.... looks like my expectations were off...
Jyst FYI I use amavisd as content_filter which results into messages like
this:
Jul 1 00:10:09 mail postfix/lmtp[10512]: 4WC3JH6JvyzFpYN:
to=<redac...@example.com>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=1.5,
delays=0.06/0.01/0.01/1.4, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 from
MTA(smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 4WC3JK2GyLzFpYh)
where the:
"250 2.0.0 from MTA(smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 4WC3JK2GyLzFpYh"
is message from amavis and further the:
"250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 4WC3JK2GyLzFpYh"
is message from postfix on port 10025, which I further see as:
Jul 1 00:10:09 mail postfix/smtpd[10522]: 4WC3JK2GyLzFpYh:
client=localhost[127.0.0.1]
...because I did not override syslog_name (didn't need that).
So, if you expect the port_name in logs, it must be send by your spampd and
if it's not, you won't find it anywhere, which is why I recommended
overriding syslog_name in master.cf
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I don't have lysdexia. The Dog wouldn't allow that.
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
