Robert Felber a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 03:45:45PM +0200, mouss wrote: >> Brian Evans - Postfix List a écrit : >>> I use and recommend policyd-weight looking at it as "if it isn't broke, >>> don't fix it." >> note however that some people use policyd-weight with "bad >> configuration". some (or is it all?) debian lists apparently use >> securitysage and unsafe rfci checks (postmaster, abuse, whois) lists in >> policyd-weight which prevents some members from posting. > > RFCI resp. all RHSBL listings are scored against total RBL hit-scores. > An additional rhsbl penalty will be added if the localpart of the > envelope sender appears to be random, the client doesn't belong > to the envelope sender nor helo domain, or the sender domain > lists a bogus MX. All in all - if RFCI scores are HIGH, then the client > does not only ignore postmaster/abuse mail. >
the sender in question is [EMAIL PROTECTED], which gets the rfci points. Add the dead securitysage to this. I don't know what scores the debian list admin(s) have set, but it looks like they should at least drop the securitysage rhsbl. (note that they whitelist yahoo, maybe via dnswl, but the user tried to post via his ISP. I won't comment on whether this is good or bad [this is bad for dkim anyway], but this showed the list of RHSBLs that fired). > The blocked user is informed of the RFCI listing. > sure. unfortunately, yahoo don't seem to care. > >>> The old maintainer >> Is Robert old? I guess you meant "the author" or "the former maintainer":) > > Two kids on your back and shoulders makes one feel old, though :-) > same here :)
