On Friday, May 09, 2014 22:48:57 Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: ... > I didn't suggest to abandon the debconf approach. > Let me rephrase my question: Do you think any of above options are > important enough (i.e. likely enough to be changed by a user) to add > debconf prompts for them?
|Unhandled option(clamd.conf): DisableCache - No |Unhandled option(clamd.conf): PartitionIntersection - No |Unhandled option(clamd.conf): MaxPartitions - No |Unhandled option(clamd.conf): MaxIconsPE - No |Unhandled option(clamd.conf): StatsEnabled - Yes |Unhandled option(clamd.conf): StatsPEDisabled - Yes |Unhandled option(clamd.conf): StatsHostID - Yes |Unhandled option(clamd.conf): StatsTimeout - Yes Additonally, while I was looking at this, I noticed that for freshclam, SafeBrowsing is not in the template and I think it should be. I think that's exactly the kind of option a user might want to enable. FYI, the links about SafeBrowsing in freshclam.conf.sample are both dead. I filed Bug #10993 upstream about it. Scott K _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
