Hi,
On 09.05.2014 22:32, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Friday, May 09, 2014 22:01:13 Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
On 09.05.2014 21:50, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2014-05-09 20:37:37 [+0200], Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
On 09.05.2014 13:06, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
On 09.05.2014 00:09, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
We gained new options:
|Unhandled option(clamd.conf): DisableCache
|Unhandled option(clamd.conf): PartitionIntersection
|Unhandled option(clamd.conf): MaxPartitions
|Unhandled option(clamd.conf): MaxIconsPE
|Unhandled option(clamd.conf): StatsEnabled
|Unhandled option(clamd.conf): StatsPEDisabled
|Unhandled option(clamd.conf): StatsHostID
|Unhandled option(clamd.conf): StatsTimeout
I'll create templates next.
I decided against creating new templates for these options.
As I see it, they wouldn't be used anyway and we already have too many
options. So I just set them to their default values in the postinst.
Do you agree with this, or should we add templates for (some of) them?
I leave this up to Scott. My opinion was to get rid of those and just
keep a verbose .conf file with a little explanation (english only
was the downside).
OK.
I think we need to keep the debconf approach. Too many people are used to it.
I'm open to suggestions about what needs to be added to the templates.
I didn't suggest to abandon the debconf approach.
Let me rephrase my question: Do you think any of above options are
important enough (i.e. likely enough to be changed by a user) to add
debconf prompts for them?
Best regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
