Yes Peter. I may sound rude but I spent hours, mails.... in the past for
example just to have a booth in a conference
to promote squeak and this just because of licensing problems.
So everybody can do whatever it wants but there is a cost and effect
associated with it.
Now the argument of oh yes this is good we can have choice is a
non-argument and it is not profitable in the long term.
Stef
Le 7/9/16 à 14:08, PBKResearch a écrit :
Stef
> We should not have "The Pharo Way" (TM) or "No way!"... suddenly
> Markus talk about feedback loops comes to mind, particularly the slide
> on page 53, regarding "An open source smalltalk ignoring all community
> contributions"[2]. This is far for being the case in this community
> and we can keep that scenario at safe distance, if we show options.
> So, dual license is an option, git is an option, markdown is an
> option. Pharo as a place with options is one where Pharo can fulfill
> its vision for more people. Let's make these options visible and
> figure out the way the work better for a wider community.
It is amazing how you like talking.
We can argue and disagree, but let's do it politely. This is just downright
rude, and quite unnecessary.
Peter Kenny
