I'm sorry to say it but you will just end up feeling alone. I wish that someone will ask you to have a non GPL license

but I have serious doubts that it will happen. If it does not happen remember that it is not the fault of the communaute.

Now if you are looking for extra paid jobs to do let us know.

We won the battle of the license after years with the SqueakL and can tell you that GPL is a BIG sign for me to say: the software does not exist. This is not by accident that we picekd up MIT and yes you can take Pharo and Moose and make the money you can with it.

Stef

I thought for a while about the license.

Fixing the ASP loophole means trying to escape from companies using a trick to avoid returning changes to the code back to the community[1]. I agree with such position. GNU AGPL is free, copyleft, approved by OSI, FSF, and used by successful projects : MongoDB, SugarCRM, OTRS, etc. If anyone want to discuss collaboration or re-licensing, for example to monetize library services, feel free to contact me privately.

Hernán

[1] http://www.fabcapo.com/2008/02/we-have-submitted-agpl-to-osi.html


2016-09-06 18:03 GMT-03:00 Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com <mailto:tu...@tudorgirba.com>>:

    Hi Hernán,

    I believe Stef was asking about the choice of picking a viral
    license vs the permissive MIT one that we use in code that gets
    into Pharo (and several other larger related projects).

    Cheers,
    Doru


    > On Sep 6, 2016, at 10:28 PM, Hernán Morales Durand
    <hernan.mora...@gmail.com <mailto:hernan.mora...@gmail.com>> wrote:
    >
    > Hi Stef,
    >
    > I used the License Differentiator tool at
    http://oss-watch.ac.uk/apps/licdiff/
    <http://oss-watch.ac.uk/apps/licdiff/>
    >
    > I like it because it fixes the 'ASP (application service
    provider) loophole' or 'privacy loophole' problem (See Choice Six
    in the tool)
    >
    > Hernán
    >
    >
    > 2016-09-06 16:47 GMT-03:00 stepharo <steph...@free.fr
    <mailto:steph...@free.fr>>:
    > Hi hernan
    >
    > why do you picked AGPL? We try to protect our community against
    license hell.
    > Stef
    > Le 6/9/16 à 11:40, Hernán Morales Durand a écrit :
    >>
    >> Hi Stephan,
    >>
    >> 2016-09-06 2:52 GMT-03:00 Stephan Eggermont <step...@stack.nl
    <mailto:step...@stack.nl>>:
    >> On 06/09/16 06:24, Hernán Morales Durand wrote:
    >>
    >> I am happy to announce the release of Territorial, a new Smalltalk
    >> library for Geographical Information Retrieval in geopolitical
    objects.
    >>
    >> Nice. Please tell us about your license choice
    >>
    >>
    >> License of the library is AGPL v3 (it is in the Notes and
    disclaimers of the manual)
    >> License of the documentation is CC BY-SA 3.0
    >>
    >> Cheers,
    >>
    >> Hernán
    >>
    >> Stephan
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >
    >

    --
    www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com>
    www.feenk.com <http://www.feenk.com>

    "If you can't say why something is relevant,
    it probably isn't."




Reply via email to