Hi Doru,

Le 27/04/2016 22:38, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Hi,

On Apr 27, 2016, at 10:17 PM, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goub...@gmail.com> wrote:

Le 27/04/2016 21:26, Hilaire a écrit :
Now I remember I already asked several months ago, and it does not work.

Editing on the value does not work for me.

http://forum.world.st/GL-inspector-editing-attribute-td4837704.html

The same mis fortune is encountered with Pharo5

I don't imagine how it can be like that and I fell unproductive now with
Playground and GTInspector, althought I acknowledge there are nice ideas
in these new tools but it can't be at the price of productivity.

Hopefully you can switch to Workspace and EyeInspector.

With the help of Nicolai Hess, we worked a bit on improving syntax colouring 
for the EyeInspector and this has been integrated. Maybe someone can look into 
doing the same with GT (to correctly set #doItReceiver, #doItContext and a few 
other things related to syntax highlighting).

What exactly is the problem in GT regarding syntax highlighting?

If you inspect a morph (say GTInspector inspect: Morph new), when you type bounds (one of Morph instance variables) in the text pane below, you get a red == erroneous / undefined var.

In the latest 5.0, in EyeInspector, it will correctly highlight bounds as a defined variable.

Moreover, and the source of the first complaint, in GTInspector, inspecting bounds will give a nil answer instead of the morph bounds. Whereas EyeInspector will properly answer (0@0) corner: (50@40).

Thierry

Cheers,
Doru


By the way, would someone know how to force the styler to re-style a text? When 
selecting another element in for example a EyeTreeInspector, this changes the 
reference class for syntax highlighting (and the styler correctly picks that) 
but the existing text isn't re-colored.

Thierry


Hilaire


Le 27/04/2016 15:51, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit :
HilaireFernandes wrote
instance variables evaluate to nil in the bottom area of the integrated
inspector.
There is no direct inst var access from the playground. I was initially
shocked by this as well and have had to resort to #instVarNamed: on several
occasions. On the bright side, you can edit the values in place in the
'Value' column above.




--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com

"Value is always contextual."








Reply via email to