You are both right.
Question about nanomsg is the thread model (a big bonus of 0mq), which
is not clear to me.
they state: "...In nanomsg the objects are not tightly bound to
particular threads and thus these problems don't exist...", about some
thread related issues in 0mq.
I'll have to check (with sources or more docs readings) if they are
bound to an external thread.
If they account for an external thread support, this is not possible
with the current vm without writing some external C code (I could but I
would not like).
Le 08/10/2014 07:07, itli...@schrievkrom.de a
écrit :
0MQ is defined by its exported C interface ...
Am 07.10.2014 um 23:51 schrieb kilon alios:
nope but it is made (unlike 0mq which is made in C++) in C so its
should be relative simple to wrap with NB or even TalkFFI. At least the
parts that interest you.
