there is nanomsg which is a rethinking on 0mq and from same developers, its MIT licensed --> http://nanomsg.org/index.html
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Alain Rastoul <alf.mmm....@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks you for your answers. > > 0mq looks great, but released with LGPL licence, and I don't like that (I > don't > understand why there is also a GPL licence file in the distribution ? - > clearly a *noway*), > I prefer a full smalltalk implementation I can debug when things go wrong. > I think latency and timing problems would be the same, no big difference > in performance. > BTW knowing about this library is cool and may be of some help (who knows), > thank you Marten for the reference. > > I agree totally with you Sven about performance and standards. > And I also agree with you about reusing someone else's work ... > I don't like to reinvent the wheel, especially a good wheel when mine > would be worst, > I would if I were a wheel specialist - clearly not the case here. > > Much (if not all) of what I found on the web about WebSocket is about a > browser/server connection > and does not talk about use in a server/server connection, hence my > question. > But you answered it, and your answer is ok with my thoughts > (plus using Zn components is a breeze) > > Thanks again > > regards, > > Alain > Le 07/10/2014 18:26, Paul DeBruicker a écrit : > > marten wrote >> >>> There are some good C libraries out there, which are suitable to >>> connect programs with each other: a good example is 0MQ. >>> >>> Marten >>> >>> -- >>> Marten Feldtmann >>> >> >> >> Hi Marten, >> >> >> Is your 0mq library posted somewhere and MIT licensed? >> >> Thanks >> >> Paul >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/About- >> Zinc-http-components-tp4783071p4783223.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> > > >
