Nanosg looks interesting too, thank you Kilon, I will look at it closer too. Do you known some working bindings with pharo ?
Alain Le 07/10/2014 21:12, kilon alios a écrit :
there is nanomsg which is a rethinking on 0mq and from same developers, its MIT licensed --> http://nanomsg.org/index.html On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Alain Rastoul <alf.mmm....@gmail.com <mailto:alf.mmm....@gmail.com>> wrote: Thanks you for your answers. 0mq looks great, but released with LGPL licence, and I don't like that (I don't understand why there is also a GPL licence file in the distribution ? - clearly a *noway*), I prefer a full smalltalk implementation I can debug when things go wrong. I think latency and timing problems would be the same, no big difference in performance. BTW knowing about this library is cool and may be of some help (who knows), thank you Marten for the reference. I agree totally with you Sven about performance and standards. And I also agree with you about reusing someone else's work ... I don't like to reinvent the wheel, especially a good wheel when mine would be worst, I would if I were a wheel specialist - clearly not the case here. Much (if not all) of what I found on the web about WebSocket is about a browser/server connection and does not talk about use in a server/server connection, hence my question. But you answered it, and your answer is ok with my thoughts (plus using Zn components is a breeze) Thanks again regards, Alain Le 07/10/2014 18:26, Paul DeBruicker a écrit : marten wrote There are some good C libraries out there, which are suitable to connect programs with each other: a good example is 0MQ. Marten -- Marten Feldtmann Hi Marten, Is your 0mq library posted somewhere and MIT licensed? Thanks Paul -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/About-__Zinc-http-components-__tp4783071p4783223.html <http://forum.world.st/About-Zinc-http-components-tp4783071p4783223.html> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
