>> >> > and so i added it. But i hate doing that. Because such switch should > not exist and VM should be able to adapt to application's memory > requirements automatically, without requiring user's input.
I'm like you but I built a shield of pragmatism else I would have never started pharo :) > Because then you have to write manual, explaining what is address > space, and why users should be educated about it in order to use VM > properly. But we should first make sure people can get money for project in Pharo and after I'm sure that we will get money to build the next generation. > And every other switch like this one you add, it makes manual bigger > and bigger, up to the point, > that it turns into complete mess of inter-depending, conflicting > switches, some of them obsolete, > some of them tricky and nobody knows how to use them properly (and > that happens for sure). But this is better than do not existing because people can not deploy professional applications with Pharo. Life is a tradeoff > >> Norbert > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. >
