On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 03:14:23PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>     On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:45 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>     > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
>     >>>>> Are these votes for getting rid of both win32.mak and bcc32.mak?
>     >
>     >> PFA a patch that does this. Did I miss something? :)
>     >
>     > Perhaps we should get rid of the WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER symbol altogether;
>     > given this patch, "#ifdef WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER" could be replaced by
>     > "#ifdef _MSC_VER".
> 
>     That's here in the patch for people wondering:
>     -#if defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__BORLANDC__)
>     +#if defined(_MSC_VER)
>      #define WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER
>      #endif
>     +1 for the renaming.
> 
> 
> Ok, since we have two votes for it, I will go ahead and do that (as a separate
> patch pushed together).'

I am fine with removing things, but I do remember one reason the Borland
part was kept is that some tool would only work with the
Borland-compiled library, not gcc or MSVC, but that was long ago.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to