On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:45 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > >>>>> Are these votes for getting rid of both win32.mak and bcc32.mak? > > > >> PFA a patch that does this. Did I miss something? :) > > > > Perhaps we should get rid of the WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER symbol altogether; > > given this patch, "#ifdef WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER" could be replaced by > > "#ifdef _MSC_VER". > > That's here in the patch for people wondering: > -#if defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__BORLANDC__) > +#if defined(_MSC_VER) > #define WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER > #endif > +1 for the renaming. > Ok, since we have two votes for it, I will go ahead and do that (as a separate patch pushed together).' > Or maybe rename it to something else --- I'm not sure what, but > > I've always found that symbol rather confusing. > > No complains here as well. Thanks for the patch. > Thanks. -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
