On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Andrew Dunstan < andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > > On 04/07/2017 09:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> This seems be the same as the 2nd error that was reported back in 2013: > >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJ2%3DPVQcW8UGNnSy%3DOw% > 3DvUK2zpjowTkzUS1B864REa7LOT140Q%40mail.gmail.com. > > Well, if it's been broken since (at least) 2013, and we've had only one > > complaint, then I'd say there are too few potential users to justify > > the maintenance burden. > > > > > > > I agree. > Are these votes for getting rid of both win32.mak and bcc32.mak? If so, count me in for the same :) Want me to do the honors, as it's my fault they're in there in the first place? -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
