pgsql-hackers  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [HACKERS] search path security issue? Magnus Hagander
  • Re: [HACKERS] search path security issue? Joe Conway
  • Re: [HACKERS] search path security issue? Fabrízio de Royes Mello
• Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for CSN based snapshots Robert Haas
• Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Fabrízio de Royes Mello
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Fabrízio de Royes Mello
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Aleksandr Parfenov
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Fabrízio de Royes Mello
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Michael Paquier
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Fabrízio de Royes Mello
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Michael Paquier
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Fabrízio de Royes Mello
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Michael Paquier
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Fabrízio de Royes Mello
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Michael Paquier
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Fabrízio de Royes Mello
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Michael Paquier
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Fabrízio de Royes Mello
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Michael Paquier
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Fabrízio de Royes Mello
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Michael Paquier
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Fabrízio de Royes Mello
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Aleksandr Parfenov
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Fabrízio de Royes Mello
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Pavel Stehule
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Craig Ringer
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Pavel Stehule
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Pavel Stehule
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Pavel Stehule
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Pavel Stehule
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start Robert Haas
• Re: [HACKERS] Error: dsa_area could not attach to a segment that has been freed Gaddam Sai Ram
• Re: [HACKERS] utility commands benefiting from parallel plan Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] utility commands benefiting from parallel plan Haribabu Kommi
• Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages Dilip Kumar
  • Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages Alexander Kuzmenkov
  • Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages Dilip Kumar
  • Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages Dilip Kumar
  • Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages Dilip Kumar
  • Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages amul sul
  • Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages Dilip Kumar
  • Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages Dilip Kumar
  • Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages Dilip Kumar
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 9.6 Logical and Fisical replication Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 9.6 Logical and Fisical replication Mario Fernando Guerrero Díaz
• Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane
• Re: [HACKERS] subscription worker signalling wal writer too much Robert Haas
• [HACKERS] v10 bottom-listed Erik Rijkers
  • Re: [HACKERS] v10 bottom-listed Amit Langote
  • Re: [HACKERS] v10 bottom-listed Magnus Hagander
  • Re: [HACKERS] v10 bottom-listed Amit Langote
• [HACKERS] Comment typo Etsuro Fujita
  • Re: [HACKERS] Comment typo Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Comment typo Etsuro Fujita
  • [HACKERS] Comment typo Etsuro Fujita
  • Re: [HACKERS] Comment typo Magnus Hagander
  • Re: [HACKERS] Comment typo Etsuro Fujita
• Re: [HACKERS] Additional logging for VACUUM and ANALYZE Michael Paquier
  • Re: [HACKERS] Additional logging for VACUUM and ANALYZE Bossart, Nathan
  • Re: [HACKERS] Additional logging for VACUUM and ANALYZE Fabrízio Mello
  • Re: [HACKERS] Additional logging for VACUUM and ANALYZE Fabrízio Mello
  • Re: [HACKERS] Additional logging for VACUUM and ANALYZE Fabrízio de Royes Mello
• [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow multiple tables to be specified in one VACUUM or ANALYZE c Michael Paquier
  • Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow multiple tables to be specified in one VACUUM or ANALYZE c Tom Lane
• Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum WIP Masahiko Sawada
  • Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum WIP Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum WIP Thomas Munro
  • Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum WIP Amit Langote
  • Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum WIP Masahiko Sawada
• Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks Jeff Janes
  • Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks Jeff Janes
  • Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks Stephen Frost
  • Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks Simon Riggs
  • Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks Nico Williams
• Re: [HACKERS] JIT compiling - v4.0 Andres Freund
  • Re: [HACKERS] JIT compiling - v4.0 Ants Aasma
  • Re: [HACKERS] JIT compiling - v4.0 Andres Freund
  • Re: [HACKERS] JIT compiling - v4.0 David Rowley
  • Re: [HACKERS] JIT compiling - v4.0 Andres Freund
  • Re: [HACKERS] JIT compiling - v4.0 Robert Haas
• [HACKERS] Re: protocol version negotiation (Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility) Badrul Chowdhury
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: protocol version negotiation (Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility) Tom Lane
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: protocol version negotiation (Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility) Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: protocol version negotiation (Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility) Badrul Chowdhury
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: protocol version negotiation (Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility) Badrul Chowdhury
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: protocol version negotiation (Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility) Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: protocol version negotiation (Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility) Badrul Chowdhury
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: protocol version negotiation (Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility) Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: protocol version negotiation (Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility) Badrul Chowdhury
• [HACKERS] Re: [PATCH] BUG #13416: Postgres >= 9.3 doesn't use optimized shared memory on Solaris anymore Sean Chittenden
  • [HACKERS] Re: [PATCH] BUG #13416: Postgres >= 9.3 doesn't use optimized shared memory on Solaris anymore Sean Chittenden
  • [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] Re: [PATCH] BUG #13416: Postgres >= 9.3 doesn't use optimized shared memory on Solaris anymore Andres Freund
  • [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] Re: [PATCH] BUG #13416: Postgres >= 9.3 doesn't use optimized shared memory on Solaris anymore Sean Chittenden
• [HACKERS] [PATCH] WIP Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] WIP Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints Andreas Joseph Krogh
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] WIP Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] WIP Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints Vik Fearing
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] WIP Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints Andreas Joseph Krogh
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] WIP Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints Nico Williams
  • [HACKERS] [PATCH] WIP Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints Peter Eisentraut
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints Peter Eisentraut
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints Thomas Munro
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints Nico Williams
• [HACKERS] datetime.h defines like PM conflict with external libraries Andres Freund
  • Re: [HACKERS] datetime.h defines like PM conflict with external libraries Andrew Dunstan
  • Re: [HACKERS] datetime.h defines like PM conflict with external libraries Andres Freund
  • Re: [HACKERS] datetime.h defines like PM conflict with external libraries Tom Lane
  • Re: [HACKERS] datetime.h defines like PM conflict with external libraries Andrew Dunstan
  • Re: [HACKERS] datetime.h defines like PM conflict with external libraries Alvaro Herrera
  • Re: [HACKERS] datetime.h defines like PM conflict with external libraries Michael Meskes
  • Re: [HACKERS] datetime.h defines like PM conflict with external libraries Tom Lane
  • Re: [HACKERS] datetime.h defines like PM conflict with external libraries Michael Meskes
• Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Pageinspect - add functions on GIN and GiST indexes from gevel Alexander Korotkov
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Pageinspect - add functions on GIN and GiST indexes from gevel Peter Eisentraut
• [HACKERS] Add TOAST to system tables with ACL? Alexander Korotkov
  • Re: [HACKERS] Add TOAST to system tables with ACL? Tom Lane
  • Re: [HACKERS] Add TOAST to system tables with ACL? Alexander Korotkov
  • Re: [HACKERS] Add TOAST to system tables with ACL? Andres Freund
  • Re: [HACKERS] Add TOAST to system tables with ACL? Alexander Korotkov
• [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case Sokolov Yura
  • Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case Sokolov Yura
• [HACKERS] Postgresql gives error that role goes not exists while it exists Nick Dro
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql gives error that role goes not exists while it exists Euler Taveira
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql gives error that role goes not exists while it exists Craig Ringer
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql gives error that role goes not exists while it exists Tom Lane
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql gives error that role goes not exists while it exists Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql gives error that role goes not exists while it exists Tom Lane
• Re: [HACKERS] pnstrdup considered armed and dangerous Andres Freund
• Re: [HACKERS] cache lookup errors for missing replication origins Masahiko Sawada
  • Re: [HACKERS] cache lookup errors for missing replication origins Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] cache lookup errors for missing replication origins Michael Paquier
• [HACKERS] Possible SSL improvements for a newcomer to tackle Zeus Kronion
  • Re: [HACKERS] Possible SSL improvements for a newcomer to tackle Tom Lane
  • Re: [HACKERS] Possible SSL improvements for a newcomer to tackle Magnus Hagander
  • Re: [HACKERS] Possible SSL improvements for a newcomer to tackle Tom Lane
  • Re: [HACKERS] Possible SSL improvements for a newcomer to tackle Stephen Frost
  • Re: [HACKERS] Possible SSL improvements for a newcomer to tackle Magnus Hagander
  • Re: [HACKERS] Possible SSL improvements for a newcomer to tackle Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] Possible SSL improvements for a newcomer to tackle Jeff Janes
  • Re: [HACKERS] Possible SSL improvements for a newcomer to tackle Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] Possible SSL improvements for a newcomer to tackle Zeus Kronion
  • Re: [HACKERS] Possible SSL improvements for a newcomer to tackle Jeff Janes
  • Re: [HACKERS] Possible SSL improvements for a newcomer to tackle Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] Possible SSL improvements for a newcomer to tackle Michael Paquier
  • Re: [HACKERS] Possible SSL improvements for a newcomer to tackle Adrien Nayrat
  • Re: [HACKERS] Possible SSL improvements for a newcomer to tackle Nico Williams
  • Re: [HACKERS] Possible SSL improvements for a newcomer to tackle Adrien Nayrat
• Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Amit Langote
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Ashutosh Bapat
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Ashutosh Bapat
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Ashutosh Bapat
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Ashutosh Bapat
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Ashutosh Bapat
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Ashutosh Bapat
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Ashutosh Bapat
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Ashutosh Bapat
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Alvaro Herrera
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Ashutosh Bapat
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Robert Haas
  • Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables Ashutosh Bapat
• [HACKERS] Combining expr{Type,Typmod,Collation}() into one function. Andres Freund
• [HACKERS] Conversion error Tatsuo Ishii
  • Re: [HACKERS] Conversion error Tatsuo Ishii
  • Re: [HACKERS] Conversion error Tom Lane
  • Re: [HACKERS] Conversion error Tatsuo Ishii
• [HACKERS] [sqlsmith] crash in RestoreLibraryState during low-memory testing Andreas Seltenreich
  • Re: [HACKERS] [sqlsmith] crash in RestoreLibraryState during low-memory testing Amit Kapila
  • Re: [HACKERS] [sqlsmith] crash in RestoreLibraryState during low-memory testing Amit Kapila

• Earlier messages
• Later messages