> Michael who? Blackwell, asssistant CFM for this CF.
> 9.4 CF1? Where are you recording the names? In the commitfest app? Right now in a googledoc. The CF app has no such capability now, although Magnus' new app might in the future. > OK, so the process is independent of commit activity. You realize that > if someone significantly modifies a patch we already have them in the > commit message as an author and on the release note item, right? So you > are really looking for reviews that modify the patch but not enough for > a committer to include their name in the commit message as an author. Oh, good point, I can look at the commit messages for where I don't need to bother. However, you pointed out that *during* CF1, the committers *didn't know* that they were supposed to include reviewers who did "major work" in the commit message. And they might miss them in the future. > Anyone can commit patches to the release notes. I am unlikely to do it, > as I lack confidence in the process, for reasons already outlined. Bruce, you are steadfastly resistant to change of any kind. >> That's why it'll be a social process. Next week I'll be posting a list >> of patches and reviewers from CF1 to this list for other people to >> correct and expand. Just like the code itself, if everybody reviews the >> list of reviewers, it'll be as good as we can get it. > > OK, at least that is a plan. Is that your plan for the future too? Sure. It's the open source way. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
