On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 02:10:17PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > Bruce, all: > > Per previous email, I wanted to make a specific proposal for what to do > on the 9.3 release notes. This is because, without policy set, we have > not been tracking which reviewers make "substantial changes" in 9.3, and > listing some-but-not-all of them would cause a lot of unhappiness among > the omitted reviewers. > > Therefore, I propose for 9.3 only that we just have the list at the end > of the release notes, including all reviewers. That way we can make > sure to include everyone equally.
Yes, there is no way to add people to the 9.3 release note items at this point --- my assumption is this is all 9.4 discussion, or maybe 9.5 as we have already committed quite a bit to 9.4. I don't think dumping reviewer names at the bottom of the 9.3 release notes is what the majority want, and it seems like an ugly short-term solution. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
