Dean Rasheed wrote: >> How should reviewers get credited in the release notes? >> >> a) not at all >> b) in a single block titled "Reviewers for this version" at the bottom. >> c) on the patch they reviewed, for each patch >> > > b) Unless they contribute enough to the patch to be considered a co-author. > > >> Should there be a criteria for a "creditable" review? >> >> a) no, all reviews are worthwhile >> b) yes, they have to do more than "it compiles" >> c) yes, only code reviews should count >> > > a) Sometimes even "it compiles" can be worthwhile, if there is doubt > over platform compatibility. All contributions should be acknowledged > and encouraged. > > >> Should reviewers for 9.4 get a "prize", such as a t-shirt, as a >> promotion to increase the number of non-submitter reviewers? >> >> a) yes >> b) no >> c) yes, but submitters and committers should get it too >> > > b) Getting your name in the fine manual is reward enough ;-)
+1, except that I like Josh's idea about a free ticket to pgCon. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
