On 2013-08-07 10:04:08 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > Bruce, > > > There are three issues here: > > > > 1. What will best motive reviewers? > > 2. What is a reasonable effort to accomplish #1? > > 3. What is acceptable for release note readers? > > > > You seem to be only focused on #1, and you don't want to address the > > other items --- that's fine --- I will still be around if people lose > > interest or the system becomes unworkable. > > Both I and other people have already addressed #2 and #3. You're also > having a huge failure of perspective here. Motivating reviewers allows > our project to continue developing PostgreSQL. Items 2 and 3 are so > insignificant in comparison to that as to not be worth discussing. > > In the novels The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy, there's a spaceship > which has been waiting 1000 years to take off because it's waiting for a > load of lemon-soaked paper napkins to be loaded. You are being Mr. > Lemon-Soaked Paper Napkin.
Holy crap Josh. I agree that we should give reviews space in the release notes, but could you please cut the ad-hominem bullshit? You're preventing your own success here. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
