On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:18:15PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > On 07/12/2013 10:49 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > > > >On 07/12/2013 01:28 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >>Josh Berkus wrote: > >> > >>>-- a couple of compromise proposals were made: > >>> > >>>a) that reviewers who do actual code modification of the patch get > >>>credited on the feature, and those who just review it get credited at > >>>the bottom of the release notes, or > >>> > > > > >I'd probably say "substantial" or "non-trivial", but otherwise +1 > > Right cause if a reviewer ends up writing (or cleaning up) all the > docs, I would say they deserve very close to equal credit. As an > example.
I can do whatever we agree to in the release notes. The big question is whether committers can properly document these people. I do think the names are going to overwhelm the release note items and we will _again_ remove some or all names. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
