Le lundi 17 juin 2013 18:41:32, Alvaro Herrera a écrit : > Joe Conway wrote: > > On 06/15/2013 11:28 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > This use case seems too narrow to me to justify the burden of > > > keeping PGXS-enabled makefiles in contrib. > > > > What was the burden of it? > > Per http://www.postgresql.org/message- id/1371093408.309.5.ca...@vanquo.pezone.net : > : 1. take up space > : 2. confuse users > : 3. produce broken external extension modules that take contrib as an > : example 4. break builds of PostgreSQL when users try to fix 3. by > : exporting USE_PGXS
But: 4. can be fixed (see patches I sent) so it is not an excuse. I agree for other points. My only grief is to loose the perfect regression tests for PGXS those contribs are. -- Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52 http://2ndQuadrant.fr/ PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
