Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > We could do something like > > PG_CONFIG = fake_intree_pg_config > PGXS := $(shell $(PG_CONFIG) --pgxs) > include $(PGXS)
There's something to that idea. Of course we would need to offer a comment about the PG_CONFIG game and propose something else for real world extensions (PG_CONFIG ?= pg_config). > where fake_intree_pg_config is a purpose-built shell script that points > to the right places inside the source tree. If that works, that gets my preference over removing PGXS support in contrib modules. Setting an example is important, in-tree build is not a useful example for anyone but contributors to core. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
