On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of mié dic 14 07:22:21 -0300 2011: >> Again, that's a caveat of the first implementation, you can't have sub >> commands support without forcing them through ProcessUtility and that's >> a much more invasive patch. Maybe we will need that later. > > I can get behind this argument: force all stuff through ProcessUtility > for regularity, and not necessarily in the first patch for this feature.
That seems like a pretty heavy dependency on an implementation detail that we might want to change at some point. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
