On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Christopher Browne <cbbro...@gmail.com> wrote: > But perhaps it's sufficient to implement what, of COMMAND TRIGGERS, > can be done, and we'll see, as we proceed, whether or not it's enough. > > It's conceivable that a first implementation won't be enough to > implement DDL triggers for Slony, and that we'd need to ask for > additional functionality that doesn't make it in until 9.3. That > seems better, to me, than putting it on the shelf, and having > functionality in neither 9.2 nor 9.3...
The thing is, I don't really see the approach Dimitri is taking as being something that we can extend to meet the requirement you just laid out. So it's not like, OK, let's do this, and we'll improve it later. It's, let's do this, and then later do something completely different, and that other thing will be the one that really solves the problem. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
