Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of mié dic 14 07:22:21 -0300 2011:
> Again, that's a caveat of the first implementation, you can't have sub > commands support without forcing them through ProcessUtility and that's > a much more invasive patch. Maybe we will need that later. I can get behind this argument: force all stuff through ProcessUtility for regularity, and not necessarily in the first patch for this feature. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
