On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > This requires no new backend code. We could even _require_ the port > number to be specified in pg_upgrade.
+1... That seems to have lots of nice properties. -- When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?" -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
