Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié jun 15 12:52:30 -0400 2011: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié jun 15 08:45:21 -0400 2011: > >> As a separate issue, I tend to agree with Tom that using psql as part > >> of the pg_upgrade process is a lousy idea and we need a better > >> solution. But let's fix one thing at a time. > > > Agreed on both counts ... but ... does this mean that we need a > > different program for programmable tasks as opposed to interactive > > ones? Dealing with standalone backends *is* a pain, that's for sure. > > So we fix the interface presented by standalone mode to be less insane. > That way, we can *reduce* the net amount of cruft in the system, rather > than adding more as all these proposals do.
+1 on that general idea, but who is going to do the work? -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
