Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mi?? jun 15 12:52:30 -0400 2011: > > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > > > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mi?? jun 15 08:45:21 -0400 2011: > > >> As a separate issue, I tend to agree with Tom that using psql as part > > >> of the pg_upgrade process is a lousy idea and we need a better > > >> solution. But let's fix one thing at a time. > > > > > Agreed on both counts ... but ... does this mean that we need a > > > different program for programmable tasks as opposed to interactive > > > ones? Dealing with standalone backends *is* a pain, that's for sure. > > > > So we fix the interface presented by standalone mode to be less insane. > > That way, we can *reduce* the net amount of cruft in the system, rather > > than adding more as all these proposals do. > > +1 on that general idea, but who is going to do the work?
And you are going to backpatch all this? I don't find this promising at all. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
