"Ross J. Reedstrom" <reeds...@rice.edu> writes:
> As an operations guy, the idea of an upgrade using a random,
> non-repeatable port selection gives me the hebejeebees.
Yeah, I agree. The latest version of the patch doesn't appear to have
any random component to it, though --- it just expects the user to
provide port numbers as switches.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
