"Greg Sabino Mullane" <g...@turnstep.com> writes: >> We also very occasionally step in and make a decision if -hackers (or >> another group) is deadlocked over an issue. For example, the whole >> 'change the name' debate.
> I wouldn't really hold that up as a shining example of a core decision. :) The point of core's action then was to put a stop to an unproductive flamewar. Which it did. Could we please not restart that? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers