Joshua D. Drake escribió: > On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 12:50 -0700, Selena Deckelmann wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Heikki > > Linnakangas<heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > > > That implies that we need a release manager. Electing one would be the > > > first step. That's a lot of work and responsibility, with lots of > > > potential for making people cross, so in practice I think as soon as > > > someone steps up to the plate and volunteers to do it, he's the one. > > > > > > I'm very happy with the way you ran the first commitfest. Thank you. > > > Want to manage the rest as well? > > > > +1 on both points. > > Isn't "core" supposed to be the release manager?
Core is a decision-making committee. A release manager is a person, maybe two, but a committee doesn't work (unless they'd split up tasks in tickets and have them assigned etc, but I don't see -core doing that.) -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
