On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 07:44 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On ons, 2009-09-02 at 12:52 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > Isn't "core" supposed to be the release manager? > > The core team has historically been the release *maker* and has some > done management of the final phases of that process. But I think the > sentiment is growing that we need more management throughout the entire > release cycle.
O.k. so a "release" team. Cool. I am assuming the team would be more directed toward upcoming major release versus minor releases to past revisions. We already pretty much have that under control between -core and -packagers. Yes? Joshua D. Drake > > -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
