Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Maybe ctid needs to be documented better? I think it's documented about as well as OID is, actually --- see http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.1/postgres/sql-syntax-columns.html which AFAIR is the only formal documentation of any of the system columns. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- RE: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- RE: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Larry Rosenman
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Lamar Owen
- [HACKERS] Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Ross J. Reedstrom
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane