Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't love current OIDs. However they have lived in PostgreSQL's > world too long and few people have pointed out that there's no magic > around OIDs. I agree to change OIDs to be per class but strongly > object to let OIDs optional. Uh ... what? I don't follow what you are proposing here. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- RE: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Larry Rosenman
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Lamar Owen
- [HACKERS] Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Ross J. Reedstrom
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian