> If you want to make oids optional on user tables, > we can vote on that. Let's vote. I'm proposing optional oids for 2-3 years, so you know how I'll vote -:) > However, OID's keep our system tables together. How?! If we want to find function with oid X we query pg_proc, if we want to find table with oid Y we query pg_class - we always use oids in context of "class" to what an object belongs. This means that two tuples from different system tables could have same oid values and everything would work perfectly. There is no magic around OIDs. Vadim ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Rod Taylor
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Lamar Owen
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Larry Rosenman
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- RE: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Larry Rosenman
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Lamar Owen
- [HACKERS] Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Ross J. Reedstrom