Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Also, without OID's, how do you fix EXACT duplicate records that happen >> by accident? > How about tid's? SELECT tid FROM tab1. "SELECT ctid", actually, but that is still the fallback. (Actually it always was --- OIDs aren't necessarily unique either, Larry.) regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Lamar Owen
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Larry Rosenman
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- RE: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- RE: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- RE: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Larry Rosenman
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Lamar Owen
- [HACKERS] Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Ross J. Reedstrom
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane