Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane writes: >> And we frequently see questions from users about how they can display >> fewer digits than the system wants to give them --- or, more >> generally, format the output in some special form. > to_char() should serve those people. Only if they're willing to go through and change all their queries. The geometry regress tests seem a good counterexample: one SET at the top versus a lot of rewriting. regards, tom lane
- RE: [HACKERS] floating point representation Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representat... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: floating point representat... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representat... Pete Forman
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representat... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representat... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representat... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representat... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representat... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representat... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representat... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representat... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: floating point representat... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: floating point representat... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Peter Eisentraut