Philip Warner writes: > At 22:29 20/02/01 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >Tom Lane writes: > >> And we frequently see questions from users about how they can display > >> fewer digits than the system wants to give them --- or, more > >> generally, format the output in some special form. > > > >to_char() should serve those people. > > > > This is not a good solution if what you want (as a user) is consistency of > output no matter who retrieves the data; people should not have to wrap > every SELECT field in to_char to get the precision/format they want. Views should serve those people. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: floating point representation Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Pete Forman
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: floating point representation Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: floating point representation Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Peter Eisentraut