Hiroshi Inoue writes: > The 7.1-release seems near. > May I provide the followings ? > SET FLOAT4_PRECISION TO .. > SET FLOAT8_PRECISION TO .. > > Or must we postpone to fix it ? Actually, you're going to have to recode the float*in() functions, using scanf, and scanf's formats are not always equivalent to printf's. And what about the geometry types that are based on floats? -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: floating point representation Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: floating point representation Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representationu Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representationu Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representationu Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representationu Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representationu Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representationu Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representationu Bruce Momjian