I wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
>
> > Peter's idea of a SET variable to control float display format might
> > not be a bad idea, but what if anything should pg_dump do with it?
> > Maybe just crank the precision up a couple digits from the current
> > defaults?
> >
>
> Currently the precision of float display format is FLT_DIG(DBL_DIG).
> It's not sufficent to distinguish float values. As Peter already suggested,
> the quickest solution would be to change XXX_DIG constants to variables
> and provide a routine to SET the variables. Strictly speaking the precision
> needed to distigush float values seems OS-dependent. It seems preferable
> to have a symbol to specify the precision.
>
The 7.1-release seems near.
May I provide the followings ?
SET FLOAT4_PRECISION TO ..
SET FLOAT8_PRECISION TO ..
Or must we postpone to fix it ?
Regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
- [HACKERS] floating point representation Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] floating point representation Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representat... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point repres... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point re... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] floating poin... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: floating poin... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] floating poin... Pete Forman
- Re: [HACKERS] floating poin... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] floating poin... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] floating poin... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] floating poin... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] floating poin... Philip Warner