On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 2:49 PM Bossart, Nathan <bossa...@amazon.com> wrote: > Yeah, I agree. What about > huge_pages_needed_for_shared_memory_size or > huge_pages_needed_for_main_shared_memory? I'm still not stoked about > using "required" or "needed" in the name, as it sounds like huge pages > must be allocated for the server to run, which is only true if > huge_pages=on. I haven't thought of a better word to use, though.
I prefer the first of those to the second. I don't find it particularly better or worse than my previous suggestion of shared_memory_size_in_huge_pages. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
