On 9/9/21, 7:03 PM, "Michael Paquier" <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > As far as the behavior is documented, I'd be fine with the approach to > keep the code in its simplest shape. I agree that the message is > confusing, still it is not wrong either as we try to query a run-time > parameter, but we need the lock.
That seems alright to me. Nathan
