On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 7:43 PM Bossart, Nathan <bossa...@amazon.com> wrote: > > shared_memory_size_in_huge_pages? It's kinda long, but a long name > > that you can understand without reading the docs is better than a > > short one where you can't. > > I think that's an improvement. The only other idea I have at the > moment is num_huge_pages_required_for_shared_memory.
Hmm, that to me sounds like maybe only part of shared memory uses huge pages and maybe we're just giving you the number required for that part. I realize that it doesn't work that way but I don't know if everyone will. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
