On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 11:10:24AM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 7:48 PM <gkokola...@pm.me> wrote: >> We can, though I am not in favour of doing so. There is seemingly >> little benefit for added complexity. > > I am really not sure what complexity you are talking about, do you > mean since with pglz we were already providing the compression level > so let it be as it is but with the new compression method you don't > see much benefit of providing compression level or speed?
You mean s/pglz/zlib/ here perhaps? I am not sure what Georgios has in mind, but my opinion stands on the latter: there is little benefit in making lz4 faster than the default and reduce compression, as the default is already a rather low CPU user. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
