‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Thursday, July 1st, 2021 at 15:58, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 3:39 PM gkokola...@pm.me wrote:
>
> > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> >
> > On Thursday, July 1st, 2021 at 12:28, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 8:34 AM Dilip Kumar dilipbal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 8:15 PM gkokola...@pm.me wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > The program pg_receivewal can use gzip compression to store the
> > > > > received WAL.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch teaches it to be able to use lz4 compression if the binary
> > > > > is build
> > > > >
> > > > > using the -llz4 flag.
> > > >
> > > > +1 for the idea
> > > >
> > > > Some comments/suggestions on the patch
> > > >
> > > > @@ -90,7 +91,8 @@ usage(void)
> > > >
> > > > printf((" --synchronous flush write-ahead log immediately
> > > >
> > > > after writing\n"));
> > > >
> > > > printf((" -v, --verbose output verbose messages\n"));
> > > >
> > > > printf(_(" -V, --version output version information, then exit\n"));
> > > >
> > > > - printf(_(" -Z, --compress=0-9 compress logs with given
> > > >
> > > > compression level\n"));
> > > >
> > > > - printf(_(" -I, --compress-program use this program for
> > > > compression\n"));
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Wouldn't it be better to call it compression method instead of
> > > >
> > > > compression program?
> > >
> > > I came here to say exactly that, just had to think up what I thought
> > >
> > > was the better name first. Either method or algorithm, but method
> > >
> > > seems like the much simpler choice and therefore better in this case.
> > >
> > > Should is also then not be --compression-method, rather than
> > > --compress-method?
> >
> > Not a problem. To be very transparent, I first looked what was already out
> > there.
> >
> > For example `tar` is using
> >
> > -I, --use-compress-program=PROG
> >
> > yet the 'use-' bit would push the alignment of the --help output, so I
> > removed it.
>
> I think the difference there is that tar actually calls an external
>
> program to do the work... And we are using the built-in library,
>
> right?
You are very correct :) I am not objecting the change at all. Just let you know
how I chose that. You know, naming is dead easy and all...
On a more serious note, what about the `-I` short flag? Should we keep it or
is there a better one to be used?
Micheal suggested on the same thread to move my entry in the help output so that
the output remains ordered. I would like the options for the compression method
and
the already existing compression level to next to each other if possible. Then
it
should be either 'X' or 'Y'.
Thoughts?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Magnus Hagander
>
> Me: https://www.hagander.net/
>
> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
